Subrecipient Monitoring

Policy Charge

Subrecipient monitoring


Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance (UG) 2 CFR 200 assigns certain responsibilities to primary recipients of federal awards that, in turn, grant subawards to other organizations. These primary recipients are termed “pass-through entities".§200.330, §200.331, and §200.500 require pass-through entities to monitor the activities of subrecipients to ensure that federal awards are used appropriately and that performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entities must also ensure that subrecipients meet any audit responsibilities.This document provides information to assist The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) in complying with the above requirements.

Policy Statement

All federal award recipients are required to maintain and monitor each subaward or subrecipient supported by funds the institute receives from the federal government. All subcontract documents must describe applicable laws and regulations required to be followed by the subrecipients. All subrecipients expending federal funds of $750,000 or more in grant dollars must perform a fiscal year audit and should be monitored routinely by UTD in accordance with UG.UTD must ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, contract and grant agreement provisions and that performance goals are achieved by the subrecipients.The subrecipient monitor processes include:

  • Verify the subrecipient qualifies as a subrecipient
  • Perform a risk assessment determination prior to issuance of subaward. If subrecipient is foreign or risk level is high, additional monitoring/analysis will be conducted with management to determine increased level of monitoring.
  • Review and monitor the subrecipient budgets and invoices.
  • Obtain pertinent information (protocols, institutional tax status, negotiated F&A rates, current fringe rates, etc.) to verify compliance with terms and conditions
  • Review subrecipients annual audit report
  • Evaluate suggested corrective actions for audit deficiencies
  • Maintain a tracking system for reporting findings and responses
  • Collect reports, as applicable
  • Provide technical assistance to subrecipients, as needed

In summary, UTD is responsible for:

  • Inform subrecipients of related federal awards and applicable requirements
  • Monitor subrecipients' activity
  • Ensure subrecipients meet the audit requirements of UG
  • Issue management decisions about relevant subrecipient audit findings

To assist with meeting these requirements, three exhibits are provided:

  • Exhibit 1 - Subrecipient Risk Assessment Questionnaire (to evaluate each subrecipients risk of noncompliance with Federal regulations) and Continuing Risk Assessment Form to be used for foreign and high risk subrecipients - To be supplied by Office of Sponsored Projects(OSP)
  • Exhibit 2 - Sub vs Contractor Determination Form - To be supplied by OSP
  • Exhibit 3 - Subrecipient Audit Certification Request (to be completed annually by subrecipient)
  • Exhibit 4 - Management Decision Letter (to be issued when a response to the certification request in Exhibit 3 indicates finding(s) relevant to UTD, and when the corrective action plan is acceptable. When the plan is unacceptable, a management decision should be drafted on a case by case basis.)
  • Exhibit 5 – Subreceipient Monitoring Form – To be supplied by OSP
  • Exhibit 6 – Subaward Closeout Certification – To be supplied by OSP

Definitions and Terms

As stated in OMB UG:

Federal Award:

Federal financial assistance and federal cost-reimbursement contracts that non-federal entities receive directly from federal awarding agencies or indirectly from pass-through entities. It does not include procurement contracts used to buy goods or services from vendors.

Limited Scope Audit:

For purposes of the subrecipient monitoring requirements of UG, limited scope audits only include agreed-upon procedures engagements conducted in accordance with either the AICPA's (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) generally accepted auditing standards or attestation standards, that are paid for and arranged by a pass-through entity and address only one or more of the following types of compliance requirements: activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs/ cost principles; eligibility; matching, level of effort, earmarking; and reporting.

Pass-through Entity:

A non-federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program.


A non-federal entity that receives a federal award directly from a federal awarding agency to carry out an activity under a federal program. The term recipient does not include subrecipients.

Research and Development:

All research activities, both basic and applied, and all development activities that are performed by a non-federal entity.

Single Audit:

An audit which includes both the entity's financial statements and the federal awards.


An award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal award received by the pass-through entity. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a federal program. A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract.

Distinctions between Subrecipients and Contractors:

With respect to a federal award, an entity may be a recipient, a subrecipient, or a contractor. Federal awards expended as a recipient or a subrecipient are subject to audit or other requirements of OMB UG. Payments made to or received as a contractor are not considered federal awards and are therefore not subject to such requirements. The following information is presented to assist with identifying subrecipient versus contractor relationships:


A non-federal entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal program; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such program. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.As stated in OMB UG §200.330:Characteristics indicative of a federal award received by a subrecipient are when the organization:

  1. Determines who is eligible to receive federal financial assistance;
  2. Has its performance measured against whether the objectives of the federal program are met;
  3. Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making;
  4. Has responsibility for adherence to applicable federal program compliance requirements;
  5. Is responsible for adherence to applicable federal program requirements specified in the Federal award;
  6. Uses federal funds to carryout a program for a public purpose specified in authorizing statute, as opposed to providing goods or services for the benefit of the pass-through entity.
    When determining whether a subrecipient or contractor relationship exists, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. It is not expected that all of the characteristics will be present and judgment should be used in determining whether an entity is a subrecipient or contractor. For example, a provider of professional services could be a subrecipient or contractor, depending on the facts and circumstances.


As stated in OMB UG §200.330: Contractor is a dealer, distributor, merchant, or other seller providing goods or services that are required for the conduct of a Federal program. Characteristics indicative of a procurement relationship between UTD and a contractor are when the contractor:

  1. Provides the goods and services within normal business operations;
  2. Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers;
  3. Normally operates in a competitive environment;
  4. Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the federal program;
  5. Is not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program.
    The University's compliance responsibilities for vendors typically are to ensure that the procurement, receipt, and payment for goods and services comply with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements.



Responsibility for following these guidelines lies primarily with Principal Investigators (PIs), their Department Chairs or other direct supervisors, and unit-level fiscal personnel with the general guidance and oversight of the colleges, schools, and divisions.

Principal Investigators(PIs)

PIs have primary responsibility for monitoring subrecipients to ensure compliance with federal regulations and both prime and subrecipient award terms and conditions. The federal government places the primary responsibility for management of federally funded projects with the PI. This includes:

  • Monitor subrecipient’s technical and programmatic activities related to the subaward;
  • Review of technical/performance reports as required;
  • Verify that the subrecipient work is conducted in a timely manner and that the results delivered are in line with the proposed statement of work;
  • Review and approve subrecipient invoices, including expenditures to ensure charges are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and within the period of performance;
  • Maintain regular contact with the subrecipient;
  • Begin subrecipient review at least 90 days prior to conclusion of the subaward period of performance which allows for department and PI to make any budgetary action or requests for extensions to sponsor
  • Review final invoice
  • Ensure all deliverables have been met
  • Maintain documentation of monitoring efforts (copies of emails, phone log, etc)

Departmental Administrators and Office of Sponsored Projects

Department Administrators, in conjunction with OSP, should assist PIs in carrying out their subrecipient monitoring responsibilities. This includes:

  • Review invoices from subrecipient to ensure they are within the parameters of the subaward budget and question expenditures, if necessary. Verify the following:
    • Correct subrecipient and cost center number are provided;
    • Total amount of award is listed and accurate;
    • Time period of invoice coincides with the previous invoice;
      • It generally should not overlap, have gaps in time, or exceed the project end date (except in special approved cases)
    • The current and cumulative total is in accordance with the approved budget(s), including any line-item categories and total amounts
    • Applied appropriate indirect cost rates and calculations
    • If any discrepancies follow-up with subrecipient, as necessary
  • Ensure that invoices are approved by the PI or his/her designee and submitted to Accounts Payable on a timely basis;
  • Request clarification from the subrecipient regarding any unusual or excessive charges;
  • Maintain copies of all invoices that provide evidence of the regular review of invoices by the PI:
  • “Evidence” can be in the form of authorized signature by the PI or his/her designee, PIs initials, email communications, or notes of meeting between the PI, department administrator and OSP;

Office of Sponsored Projects

OSP is responsible for the oversight of subrecipient documentation (including award and audit certification documentation requirements) and ensuring that the UTD’s subrecipient monitoring procedures are compliant with federal and other applicable regulations. These responsibilities include:

  • Verify the subrecipeint meets the UG definition of subrecipient, utilizing the Sub vs. Contractor Determination Form (EXHIBIT 2)
  • Include all required information per UG §200.331
  • Determine whether the subrecipient or its PIs are debarred or suspended from receiving federal funds
  • Perform a Risk Assessment (EXHIBT 1) for all subrecipients
    • Perform site-visits or increased monitoring based on Risk Assessment level of risk (high risk only)
    • As regulated in UG §200.331(e)
  • Maintain all subrecipient information in PeopleSoft Award Module
    • Subrecipient and PI name
    • Budget amounts
    • Subaward begin/end dates
    • Amendments to contract information
      • Dates
      • Budget
    • Annually review all active subawards
      • Obtain subrecipient monitoring from signed by PI (EXHIBIT 5) prior to issuance of amendments
      • If a subrecipient has been identified as high-risk or is foreign, complete continuing risk assessment form (EXHIBIT 1) prior to issuance of amendments
      • Request Audit Certification Letters from all subrecipients (EXHIBIT 3)
      • Review returned certification letters to verify that no audit findings related to federal funds provided by UTD are reported.
        • If no findings are indicated, OSP will save the certification and no further action is necessary.
        • If findings are indicated, OSP will make a management decision:
          • The management decision (EXHIBIT 4) must be issued within 6 months of receipt of the audit report;
          • Prior to issuing the management decision, UTD may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs;
          • Send Management Decision Letter to subrecipient containing the following:
            • Whether or not the audit finding is sustained.
            • Reason for the decision.
            • Expected auditee action – repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action.
            • If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given.
            • Any appeal process available to the auditee.
          • Retain all documentation in official award files.
  • Obtain subaward closeout certification form (EXHIBIT 6) from subrecipient within six (6) months of project end

Office of Post Award Management (OPM)

OPM is responsible for oversight of the financial management of subrecipient monitoring and ensuring that the UTD’s subrecipient monitoring procedures are compliant with federal and other applicable regulations. These responsibilities include:

  • Monitoring the subrecipients' fiscal activity

    • Maintain a tracking spreadsheet of subawards

      • Used as audit source of all subawards

        • Identifies active Subrecipients

        • Provide OSP annual list of subrecipients requiring audit certification letters

        • Compare list to subrecipients information in PeopleSoft Award Module

          • Discrepancies require follow-up with OSP information

        • Identifies status of subrecipient budget information

          • Budget amounts by account code

          • Expenses

          • Encumbrances

          • Budget available

        • Ensure cost center is budgeted correctly

          • Budgeted as Federal, State, or Other based on source of funds

          • Over and under $25,000 budgeted correctly

          • Account codes for over and under $25,000 correct

            • Monitor to ensure expenses are being expensed accordingly

          • Indirect Cost budget – budgeted correctly to ensure sufficient funds

          • Ensure the department is producing the correct purchase order amount for the subaward

        • Review and approve subrecipient fiscal transactions

          • Review Purchase Orders for budget availability and allowability

          • Ensure the charges are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and within the period of performance

          • Contact departments to resolve any issues

        • Closeout - Notify PI to begin review at least 90 days prior to conclusion of the subaward period of performance – see PI responsibility for further information on close-out

Subrecipient Risk Assessment Questionnaire and Continuing Risk Assessment Form


The University of Texas at Dallas is required per 2 CFR 200.331(b) at a minimum, “evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. . .”

Sub vs Contractor Determination Form


Checklist to Determine Subrecipient or Contractor / Vendor / Consultant Classification


Contractor and Subrecipient are defined in OMB UG §200.330. Generally, the determination of the relationship with an external entity is verified through the institutional review of the proposal narrative, budget justification, and other related proposal documents, including a description of the work to be performed, as well as through discussions with key personnel prior to proposal submission. Once awarded, this form will be used to provide documentation evidence of the decision making process for audit purposes.


Complete sections one and two of the checklist by marking all characteristics that apply to the outside entity. The section with the greatest number of marked characteristics indicates the likely type of relationship the entity will have with UTD. On occasion there may be exceptions to the type of relationship indicated by the completed checklist. In these situations,
the substance of the relationship should be given greater consideration than the form of agreement between UTD and the outside entity. Section 3 should be used to provide documentation on the use of judgment in determining the proper relationship classification.

Subrecipient Audit Certification

Exhibit 3

Management Decision Letter

Exhibit 4

Sample letter to be issued when a subrecipient has an audit finding (or findings) related to UTD and when their corrective action plan is acceptable. When applicable, the letter should further address situations where costs are disallowed and require repayment, financial adjustments are necessary, or other action is needed. In those cases, the management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. Those corrective action plans that may not be acceptable to UTD should be handled on a case-by-case basis.

Subrecipient Monitoring Form

Exhibit 5

The subrecipient monitoring form verifies monitoring is taking place and identifies deficiencies or concerns. Annually and/or prior to issuance of any amendments, OSP will send the subrecipient monitoring form to PI for completion and signature.

Subaward Closeout Certification

Exhibit 6

After project end and the required timeframe for submitting all reports has passed, OSP will send the subaward closeout certification form to the administrative and authorized official of the subrecipient for completion and signature. Once returned, form will be saved and any outstanding issues will be addressed. Must be completed within 6 months of project end, preferably within 120 days of project end.

Issued: June 2015



Article ID: 1027
Mon 1/23/23 9:36 AM
Mon 3/27/23 9:59 AM

Related Articles (17)

This article shows The University of Texas at Dallas (UT Dallas) institutional guidelines for Compensation Confirmation.
This article shows the procedure on Cost Sharing.
This article shows the process on how to close-out a Post-Award Management Project.
This article follows a set of guidelines that outline the allowable costs for grants, contracts, and subawards at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article provides guidelines for Participant support costs that are paid to (or on behalf of) participants or trainees (not employees) for participation in meetings, conferences, symposia, workshops, and/or other training projects.
This article outlines the period of performance of costs guidelines for grants, contracts, and subawards at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article explains the re-budgeting process before meeting project objectives.
This article outlines the Office of Research business process for record retention of sponsored projects document files at The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article provides information on the process of research subject payments for purposes of recruitment or encouragement for participation in a project at The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article provides information on research assistant vs participant cost vs subject payments.
This article shows the outline of Budget Account to Proposal Crosswalk for faculty and staff members at The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article outlines the process of cost sharing at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article provides guidelines and criteria on transferring charges to and/or from a sponsored award.
This article outlines the guidelines on Travel Costs on federally funded contracts and grants at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD).
This article shows the process on creating a Project Cost Center.
This article shows the guidelines of different sponsor's approval.
This article highlights detailed information on The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance.